全球化（globalization）一词，是一种概念，也是一种人类社会发展的现象过程。全球化目前有诸多定义，通常意义上的全球化是指全球联系不断增强，人类生活在全球规模的基础上发展及全球意识的崛起。国与国之间在政治、经济贸易上互相依存。全球化亦可以解释为世界的压缩和视全球为一个整体。二十世纪九十年代后，随着全球化势力对人类社会影响层面的扩张，已逐渐引起各国政治、教育、社会及文化等学科领域的重视，引发大规模的研究热潮。对于“全球化”的观感是好是坏，目前仍是见仁见智，例如全球化对于本土文化来说就是一把双刃剑，它也会使得本土文化的内涵与自我更新能力逐渐模糊与丧失。
- CCG南方国际人才研究院
- CCG北方国际人才研究院
- CCG一带一路研究所
- CCG世界华商研究所
- CCG数字经济委员会
- CCG南方国际人才研究院图片
- CCG北方国际人才研究院图片
- CCG世界华商研究所图片
- CCG一带一路研究所图片
- CCG数字经济委员会图片
- 成为系列论坛会员
- 成为系列论坛会员联系
- 概况介绍
- 兼职研究员
- 未分类
- 概况
- 全球化
- 全球治理
- 美国
- 国际人才政策
- 中美贸易
- 国际教育理念与政策
- 中国开放指数
- 新闻动态
- CCG品牌论坛
- 中国与全球化论坛
- 学术委员会专家
- 主席/理事长
- 中文图书
- 品牌论坛
- 研究合作
- 重点支持智库研究与活动项目
- 概况视频
- 主任
- 香港委员会名誉主席
- 关于
- 团队
- 国际关系
- 国际组织
- 加拿大
- 华人华侨
- 国际贸易
- 来华留学
- 区域与城市
- 媒体报道
- 二轨外交
- 中国企业全球化论坛
- 高级研究员
- 资深副主席
- 英文图书
- 圆桌研讨
- 建言献策
- 概况手册
- 副主任
- 理事申请
- 香港委员会名誉副主席
- 顾问
- 研究
- 国际移民与人才流动
- 区域合作
- 欧洲
- 中国海归
- 来华投资
- 出国留学
- 大湾区
- 活动预告
- 名家演讲
- 中国全球智库创新年会
- 特邀高级研究员
- 副主席
- 杂志
- 名家演讲
- 媒体采访
- 年报
- 秘书长
- 企业理事
- 香港委员会主席
- 国际顾问
- 国际贸易与投资
- 一带一路
- 亚洲
- 留学生
- 对外投资
- 国际学校
- 动态
- 名家午餐会
- 中国人才50人论坛
- 特邀研究员
- 理事长
- 媒体采访
- 文章投稿
- 副秘书长
- 活动支持
- 香港委员会副主席
- 国际教育
- 非洲
- 数字贸易
- 活动
- 智库圆桌会
- 常务理事
- 智库访谈
- 国际合作
- 总监
- 中国留学人员创新创业论坛
- 研究员
- 研究支持
- 香港委员会常务理事
- 国内政策
- 拉美
- 专家
- 理事
- 直播
- 捐赠支持
- 主管
- 中国国际教育论坛
- 个人捐赠
- 前瞻研究
- 澳洲
- 咨询委员会
- 企业理事
- 其他
- 捐赠联系
- 中东
- 成为理事
- 研究报告
- 建言献策
- 出版物
- 理事申请联系
- 智库研究
- 音视频专区
- 联系我们
- 观点
- 捐赠
- 工作机会
- 香港委员会
-
Laurence Brahm: Nobody should be first in a community with a shared future
Chinese President Xi Jinping delivers a keynote speech at the opening plenary of the 2017 annual meeting of the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Jan 17, 2017. [Photo/Xinhua] On Jan 26, American President Donald Trump addressed the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. Repeating his slogan of “America first,” Trump set forth his vision of business greed to achieve short-term self-interest, as the principles he will promote as American values in the years ahead. For the developing world, there is both concern and even fear over the trajectory of Washington’s current global policies, manifested in imperial arrogance, unscientific disregard of our planet’s ecological fragility, and reckless brinkmanship in regions of political and cultural sensitivity. Europeans who have traditionally upheld “American values” as representing “North Atlantic values” are now questioning what these values really are and what they mean in the Trump era? In fact, the world is looking for a new set of values. Ironically, just one year ago, following his own speech at Davos, President Xi Jinping addressed the United Nations Office in Geneva. There before the UN, Xi put forth a vision of comprehensive shared development based on recognition of the economic interconnectivity of all nations as a global community that is both interdependent and increasingly integrated. President Xi called it “a community with a shared future for mankind.” We could understand the contextual framework for a “community with a shared future for mankind” as supporting ideas of diversity, mutual respect of cultural and social differences, and multilateralism. Included with these are goals of eliminating poverty, food and water security, and reducing conflict and violence through economic empowerment and respect for the cultural differences of others. An ill-conceived, un-informed, and short sighted cowboy approach – my way is the best way, so ride roughshod over everyone else – attributes to many of the economic dislocations, refugee crisis, and terrorism that ceaselessly erupt across the planet today. Conflict, war and terror arise when people are disempowered economically and when their identity is marginalized. Narrow self- interest is the reason for our global political volatility. Investment in infrastructure and connectivity that can empower people locally, and together with respect for their cultural integrity, will reduce a vast amount of conflict and terror. The idea of a “community with a shared future for mankind” of course draws from China’s own experience in rising from poverty to economic strength. Without infrastructure, transport, communications, electricity, water and health care, people’s lives will not improve. But such infrastructure needs to be smart, green and blue. “Ecological Civilization,” China’s new policy for reducing fossil fuel dependency, restoring the environment, and respecting natural boundaries and culture, not only calls for the protection of the environment; it envisions environmental protection as the next driver for technology, innovation and a plethora of new industries for renewable energy grids, transport and household appliances. Today China leads the world as the largest issuer of green bonds, debt instruments that must apply finance to renewable infrastructure development. It is leading the global fight against climate change. China is laying out a football field worth of solar panels each day, leading the world in renewable energy grids, while the Trump administration is turning America back to a coal-fired industrial era. Meanwhile China leads the world in renewable energy system exports, while Trump slaps tariffs on Chinese made solar panels. Ecological civilization could prove to be China’s soft power engine in the decade ahead. Today with the emerging South-South cooperation, it is more a question of capital investment, infrastructure and integration of experiences and coordination of policies on a host of international issues. In 2016 the World Bank’s total aid to developing countries amounted to $61 billion. In the same year China’s aid reached $727.2 billion. Loans from China’s EXIM Bank alone exceeded the total provided by the World Bank. China is taking its own experience and sharing it globally through the Belt and Road Initiative. Evolving an integrated network of communications and transportation will facilitate investment and development across the South-South zone or belt, and build economic resilience for everyone involved. This is making the vision of a “community with a shared future for mankind” a reality. China does not come with political conditions or imposition of cultural values. It is about financing the infrastructure and connectivity to get people out from underdevelopment, end poverty, and make nations competitive. Only by respecting each other’s culture, heritage and diversity can we have a world of diversified localization rather than monolithic globalization. The solution for any country or people does not need to come from outside. The solution is within the culture, economy and psychology of each people and nation. From these sets of shared solutions that are pragmatic, ecologically scientific, and sensitive to local cultures and conditions, we see emergence of the concept of a “community with a shared future for mankind.” Only this way can there be true diversity and in turn resilience. The concept of a “community with a shared future for mankind” is not based on a single model, but about being responsive to change, rather than reacting to crisis. About Author Laurence Brahm, a senior research fellow at Center for China and Globalization(CCG), founding director of the Himalayan Consensus.
2018年1月31日 -
庞中英：全球化的风幡将如何飘拂？
庞中英，CCG特邀高级研究员，中国海洋大学海洋发展研究院院长
2018年1月31日 -
波兰前副总理科勒德克: 新自由主义2.0方兴未艾 成为美国及世界经济新诅咒
格泽高滋·W·科勒德克（Grzegorz. W. Kolodko），波兰前副总理，全球化智库（CCG）国际专家委员会专家。
2018年1月15日 -
孙振宇：走向全球价值链高端，中国仍需多方面努力
孙振宇，中国世贸组织研究会会长，中国首任驻WTO大使
2018年1月15日 -
何宁：“WTO+”说明多边贸易体制仍有吸引力
何宁，全球化智库（CCG）高级研究员、商务部世贸司原司长
2018年1月8日
