全球治理、国际组织、区域合作和“一带一路”是CCG全球化研究领域的重要组成部分。作为中国最早以全球化命名的智库，CCG创办了“中国与全球化论坛”并设置全球化相关国际议题；在海内外举办了“WTO改革”、“多边治理”、“一带一路”等专题研讨会，把“一带一路”这一主题首次带到国际安全与治理领域的世界高规格会议——慕尼黑安全会议。基于多年对全球化领域的全面研究，CCG发布出版了《“一带一路”的国际合作共赢方案及实现路径》，《全球化与逆全球化》、《全球化向何处去：大变局与中国策》等研究报告和图书，其中Edward Elgar 出版社出版的Handbook on China and Globalization是为数不多的由智库在国际权威学术出版社出版的全英文书籍。CCG提出的两项倡议入选首届巴黎和平论坛，为中国智库更充分参与全球治理与国际合作开拓了崭新模式。此外，CCG与WTO、UN 、经济合作国家组织（OECD）、世界银行、国际货币基金组织（IMF）等众多国际组织、国际智库和相关机构建立了良好的长效合作机制。
-
梁国勇：外商投资法草案完善中国投资环境
梁国勇，全球化智库（CCG）特邀高级研究员、联合国贸发会议经济事务高级官员
2019年3月18日 -
魏建国：外商投资法是给外商的定心丸
专家简介
2019年3月15日 -
He Weiwen: A Milestone in China’s Opening-Up by Law
By He Weiwen, a senior research fellow at the Center for China and Globalization(CCG).
2019年3月13日 -
魏建国： 重视投资保护，外资立法吹响 制度型开放冲锋号
专家简介
2019年3月11日 -
High hopes voiced for introduction of Foreign Investment Law
Edward Lehman. [Photo by Wang Zhuangfei/China Daily] A new law, to be voted on during the two sessions, could be the most significant in terms of China’s opening-up since the country joined the World Trade Organization, according to a leading lawyer in the country. The new law will reduce the number of sectors on the negative list in which foreign companies are barred from operating, protect the intellectual property of overseas investors and ban forced technology transfers. Edward Lehman, managing director of Lehman, Lee & Xu in Beijing, said the Foreign Investment Law could create a new level playing field for foreign companies in China. "I don’t believe there has been as big an adjustment in the law as this since China’s accession to the WTO in 2001," he said. "It puts foreigners on equal ground, but in allowing increased competition in what were considered protected areas, it can only stimulate economic activity." The draft law was announced at the end of December by the National People’s Congress, the top legislature, which then asked for comments from foreign companies and all interested parties by Feb 24. Andy Mok, research fellow at the Center for China and Globalization(CCG), an independent think tank in Beijing, believes such legislation is vital if China is to advance to the next stage of its development. "China is moving into its science and technology phase, and technological advancement relies on intangible assets such as patents and protecting intellectual property. It is important there are moves in this area," he said. Jiang Hao, a partner in Shanghai for management consultancy Roland Berger, also welcomed the proposed law. "China will open up more investment areas and loosen many restrictions on existing industries, and this will present many opportunities for foreign companies who are interested in this huge market," he said. However, Jiang said it was not just the law but the implementation of it that mattered. "We can expect issues regarding transparency and inconsistency of execution that will create challenges. We believe the government is determined to tackle these issues," Jiang said. The European Union Chamber of Commerce in China welcomed moves to streamline legislation into a single law. But Mats Harborn, president of the chamber, said it would have preferred more time to consider the legislation. "The law will have major ramifications for all foreign companies in China for the foreseeable future, so the drafting process must be given the due time and attention for such an important piece of legislation," he said. Lehman, who has been in China since the 1980s, said there is a tendency for foreign companies operating in the country to see the scales tipped against them. "At the beginning of China’s reform and opening-up, foreign companies were lured with the offer of tax breaks, which were not offered to Chinese companies, and there was resentment about this," he said. The lawyer said that despite the new law, intellectual property protection will remain a complex issue. "The new law will give companies who are in restricted sectors where they have to operate with a joint venture partner more protection against forced technology transfers," he said. "However, in reality, even foreign companies that operate as wholly-owned ventures might have to give away some of their IP when bidding for government contracts, for example. This is not unique to China but happens elsewhere as well." From China Daily，2019-3-1
2019年3月7日
